Industry-level torture: without composite materials can really make commercial-grade roast chicken bag?

‘Environmental requirements are tightening, composite film recycling is difficult and costly how to do?’

▶ Market status: 90% of aluminium foil composite bags are difficult to degrade, and 7,800 tonnes of mixed waste film is produced annually.

▶ User pain point: the market ‘pseudo-environmental’ bags need to split the outer layer of the printed film, recycling costs increased by 40%.

Technology breakthrough: pure PET/NY single material roasted chicken bag four innovative structures

Reconstruction of the track] Blown film process generational innovation

✅ Pure PET bags with ultra-high temperature resistance programme

☛ Temperature resistance peak exceeds 220℃.

✅ Toughening and puncture-resistant solution for NY bags

☛ Tensile strength increased to 65MPa

☛ Oil and grease penetration resistance up to ASTM Class 3 (3 hours without leakage)

Performance comparison test (200℃/60min roasted whole chicken)

Punchable Adjustable Air Hole Array

·3D laser focused perforation technology (pore size 30-50μm)

· Dynamically adjustable water vapour escape (3.2g/min gold value)

· Burst pressure from 0.28MPa to 0.09MPa

Scenario-based verification data

Home fast cooking scenario (6L mini oven)

· Chicken wings cooking time reduced to 18 mins (25 mins for normal bag)

· Surface browning uniformity score 9.1/10 (9.3/10 for composite bag)

Central kitchen mass production scene

· Data from a chicken products company:

▸ 83% reduction in average monthly breakage complaints

▸ 67% reduction in waste sorting costs (no need to sort composites)

Examples of Carbon Neutral Pioneer Companies

· Supply chain real-world test:

▸ 3.2kg CO₂ carbon footprint per PET bag, 54% lower than composite bags

▸ Annual emission reduction equivalent to planting 8,000 spruce trees